Fines Hiked For Firms Employing Illegal Migrants

The recent announcement by Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick regarding the proposed rules to triple fines for businesses and landlords supposedly supporting illegal migrants has ignited significant concerns, calling for careful reconsideration, as their implications run deep and require immediate attention.

Digital Harms

Primarily, these rules continue to unfairly shift the burden onto employees and migrants, particularly when considering the consistent errors made by technical companies in deploying verification checks. Imposing substantial fines on employers and landlords could inadvertently lead to hastened decisions that negatively impact migrants and employees. This situation is exacerbated by the ongoing issues with verification technology, potentially leading to wrongful flagging and unjust repercussions, disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities.

The government’s assertion that “illegal working and renting are significant pull factors” oversimplifies the intricate drivers of migration. Imposing hefty fines is unlikely to address the root causes, often intertwined with socio-economic hardships and limited legal pathways. Instead of offering a solution, these rules risk intensifying the plight of vulnerable migrants.

Disproportionate Sanctions

Furthermore, these rules risk undermining the principles of justice and proportionality. The substantial increase in fines, particularly for repeat offenders, might be perceived as excessive and disproportionate punishment. The overarching goal should be establishing an environment promoting fairness and equality, even for those lacking proper documentation.

The technical glitches in verification checks and the implementation of digital identity systems raise valid concerns about data security and privacy. Entrusting migrants’ fate to potentially flawed third-party platforms could expose them to unwarranted risks. The potential for discrimination, mainly through facial recognition software, adds another layer of apprehension.

Digital Hostile Environment

In addition, the proposed rules fail to address the issue of unfair dismissal or discrimination in the workplace due to pending immigration status applications with the Home Office. Migrants often live in fear as their futures hinge on error-prone digital services or employers who might not comprehend the intricate rules. This sustains an atmosphere of insecurity, anxiety, and potential exploitation.

Lastly, the undue emphasis on penalties evades the necessity for comprehensive immigration reform. The challenges at hand are intricate and multifaceted. Relying solely on punitive measures overlooks the requirement for a nuanced approach and the problem of outsourcing immigration enforcement to a third party. The government should integrate the legal pathways for employment and residency with a complete change to the hostile environment and borders everywhere policy.

The potential drawbacks of the new rules are apparent and could potentially exacerbate the difficulties faced by migrants and employees.

Holistic Strategy Needed

The Home Office has amended the employer’s guidance on this matter since February 2008 at least 29 times, resulting in a convoluted policy with conflicting amendments.

So a holistic and balanced strategy is imperative to address the systematic errors in verification technology, the vulnerabilities of migrants, and the socio-economic factors contributing to illegal migration. The government should provide lucid, equitable, and unambiguous guidelines, rather than subjecting migrants to the risk of homelessness and unemployment through these rules.

Find out more insights into the Challenge the Checks campaign here.


Tripling of fines for those supporting illegal migrants:

Changes to Right to Work Guidance:

migrant digital justice newsletter

Keep up to date with developments in data and technology affecting our immigration and migrants’ rights.

Subscribe Now

Migrant Digital Justice

The Migrant Digital Justice programme empowers the migrants’ rights sector to challenge technologies used in immigration controls.
Find Out More
Migrant Digital Justice