call +44 20 7096 1079
March 10, 2010 | Jim Killock

Letter to the FT

 

ORG, alongside consumer and industry groups, had this letter published in the Financial Times today

Amendment 120A Digital Economy Bill March 10th, 2010

Dear Sirs,

We regret that the House of Lords last week adopted amendment 120A to the Digital Economy Bill. This amendment not only significantly changes the injunctions procedure in the UK but will lead to an increase in Internet service providers blocking websites accused of illegally hosting copyrighted material without cases even reaching a judge. The amendment seeks to address the legitimate concerns of rights-holders but would have unintended consequences which far outweigh any benefits it could bring.

Endorsing a policy that would encourage the blocking of websites by UK broadband providers or other Internet companies is a very serious step for the UK to take. There are myriad legal, technical and practical issues to reconcile before this can be considered a proportionate and necessary public policy option.  In some cases, these may never be reconciled. These issues have not even been considered in this case.

The Lords have been thoughtful in their consideration of the Bill to date.  It is therefore bitterly disappointing that the House has allowed an amendment with obvious shortcomings to proceed without challenging its proponents to consider and address the full consequences.  Put simply, blocking access as envisaged by this clause would both widely disrupt the Internet in the UK and elsewhere, threatening freedom of speech and the open Internet, without reducing copyright infringement as intended. To rush through such a controversial proposal at the tail end of a Parliament, without any kind of consultation with consumers or industry, is very poor law making.

We are particularly concerned that a measure of this kind as a general purpose policy could have an adverse impact on the reputation of the UK as a place to do online business and conflict with the broader objectives of Digital Britain.  This debate has created a tension between specific interest groups and the bigger prize of promoting a policy framework that supports our digital economy and appropriately balances rights and responsibilities.  All parties should take steps to safeguard this prize and place it at the heart of public policy in this area.

Yours sincerely,

Richard Allan, Director of Policy EU, Facebook

Neil Berkett, Chief Executive, Virgin Media

Matt Brittin, Managing Director, Google UK and Ireland

Charles Dunstone, Chairman, Talk Talk Group

Jessica Hendrie-Liaño, Chair, Internet Services Providers Association (ISPA)

Jill Johnstone, International Director, Consumer Focus

Jim Killock, Executive Director, Open Rights Group

Mark Lewis, Managing Director, eBay UK Ltd

Ian Livingstone, Chief Executive, BT Group

Professor Sarah Oates, University of Glasgow

Dr Jenny Pickerill, University of Leicester

Mark Rabe, Managing Director, Yahoo! UK and Ireland

Dr Paul Reilly, University of Leicester

Jess Search, Founder, Shooting People independent film makers

Professor Ian Walden, Queen Mary, University of London

Tom Watson MP

 

 

google plusdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinstumbleupontwitteremail


Comments (0)



This thread has been closed from taking new comments.