Telecoms and Television

Posted by Ben Laurie in DRM, Data Retention at December 4th, 2005

“john” writes, in a comment to an earlier post:

data retention; the LIBE report is being voted on the 12th and all the Parliamentary groups meet on Tuesday to decide their positions. There is some interesting new stuff on Statewatch about recent discussions after the JHA Council on the 1st for those that are interested in this kind of thing. Christ knows what is going to happen with this one, the Council still isn’t anywhere near agreeing internally according to the docs on Statewatch so perhaps they might have to accept what comes out of the Parliament. V complex…
I would also highlight the fact that the Commission is calling for input on the Telecoms Regulatory Package review, which is pretty important as it is the framework for infrastructure regulation in the EU. More worrying I would have thought is the proposed review of Television without Frontiers which could have enormous impact for digital content online, I’m quite surprised it hasn’t been mentioned on here before. The Commission’s goals are somewhat unclear to say the least and could result in filtering and online content regulation to comply with their stated public policy goals. More on Euractiv and Ofcomwatch.

3 Responses to “Telecoms and Television”

  1. bodnbotbod Says:

    Comments on the site, not the above post:

    As someone with an amatuerish interest in these issues, and given that ORG’s stated aim is to “raise awareness” of DRM I’m disappointed to see a blog but no kind of “For Dummies” style guide to the issues. Has any thought been given to the idea of a simple guide to how DRM effects a person who isn’t technically savvy?

    I’ve written For Dummies style guides in previous office jobs “How To Use the Accounts System” etc. I might be willing to take something of that nature on for a derisory payment. I’d be happy to produce the beginnings for free and put it before your organisation for review and you can see if you’d wish me to pursue it.

    On other site issues: Although, since you’re a single issue pressure group, it’s going to be hard to categorise your posts clearly I still think having “uncategorised” / “stuff” AND “entirely frivolous” is rather off-putting and lazy.

    Mission statement: Light grey on white? Have a thought for visitors with impaired sight.

    Full disclosure: I’m personal friends with the troublesome Nick Mailer and Martin Coxall (I assure you he rubs ME up the wrong way far more than he rubs you), they of the Trotskyite wing of the Soho launch.

    (Way to talk yourself out of a small commission, Bod… I always back the wrong horse).

  2. kenkil Says:

    This looks like a great way to gather our comments and thoughts on this topic.

    But I suggest we do somthing similar for another review, underway to investigate Copyright and Patent law in the UK. The spin suggests it will consider extending copyright terms further, and simplifying the patent process. See link for details- nothing concrete on how to make submissions yet.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/05/uk_intellectual_property_rights_review/

  3. Ben Laurie Says:

    I think we’re on that already: http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2005/12/02/chancellor-announces-intellectual-property-review/.

Leave a Reply

Contributors to the Open Rights Group wiki and blog should note their input forms part of a collaborative resource that is Creative Commons (by-sa 2.5) licensed. We hope these resources will be reused and remixed in the public interest. You do not need to seek permission before you re-use our works, although we do require that users attribute Open Rights Group as their source, and license the resulting work under the same terms.