July 26, 2009 | Default Admin User

Category


Search Results

newsnodes: 55,125,231,333,449,5282,5688,6208,7233,7656

Every issue is a digital issue

By Cory Doctorow on Mar 19, 2015.

By Cory Doctorow Mar 19 2015

Comments (0)
It is ten years since Cory Doctorow helped Danny O'Brien and Suw Charman-Anderson found ORG, the UK still needs its own campaigning digital rights group.

GCHQ’s hacking technologies go unregulated and unsupervised

By Jim Killock on Mar 16, 2015.

By Jim Killock Mar 16 2015

Comments (0)
Tags:
As reported in Wired, GCHQ’s development of hacking technologies is completely absent of external regulation, and their bosses at the Foreign Office lack the ability to understand what they are doing.

What the ISC missed - ORG's quick take on the ISC report

By Ed Johnson-Williams on Mar 12, 2015.

By Ed Johnson-Williams Mar 12 2015

Comments (1)
Tags:
These are our first impressions on reading the Intelligence and Security Committee's key recommendations in its Privacy and Security Report.

MPs criticise TTIP on corporate courts and lack of transparency

By Ed Johnson-Williams on Mar 10, 2015.

By Ed Johnson-Williams Mar 10 2015

Comments (0)

A committee of MPs released a report today on TTIP (the Trans-Atlantic Trade & Investment Partnership) - the trade agreement being negotiated in secret by the EU and the USA. The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee's report focuses on the risks posed to the environment by TTIP.

But they also raise serious concerns about the transparency of the negotiations and ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) - a measure allowing foreign companies to sue the European Union and/or Member State governments if they pass laws which would negatively affect their future profits.

ORG shares these concerns and has raised them in the past.

On ISDS, the committee flags up that neither the UK Government nor the EU has presented a convincing case for the inclusion of ISDS. They also raise concerns about the chilling effect of ISDS on future legislation.

EU states must retain their 'right to regulate', but a TTIP treaty text that enshrines such a safeguard will be meaningless if the prospect of ISDS litigation produces a chilling effect on future regulation-setting. A compelling case for the inclusion of an ISDS in TTIP has not yet been made, and there are unresolved doubts about how well international arbitration courts would operate. If there is to be an ISDS, the parties will need to agree a robustly framed one which prevents unwarranted litigation, adopting the lessons from the recently negotiated ISDS provisions in the EU/Canada trade treaty, to circumscribe the terms on which litigation could be initiated against policies to improve environmental or health protections. (page 19-20)

Many people are concerned that Governments could be discouraged from passing new legislation due to ISDS. If the Government passed legislation that would impact on a foreign company's profits, it would risk having to pay to defend itself at a tribunal and then paying out compensation if it lost the case. The Department for Business argued in its representation to the committee that there is no cause for concern but the committee's disagreed and concluded that ISDS could produce a chilling effect.

On transparency, the committee is concerned that the secretive nature of the negotations makes it impossible to judge whether the risks to environmental safeguards are being dealt with. This is exactly the same problem that we have with digital rights issues in TTIP. We know that negotiations are happening on our issues but because of the lack of transparency we cannot fully analyse whether the risks to our digital rights are being adequately handled.

TTIP potentially presents risks for environmental safeguards, as we have described in this report, but there is also scope for these to be satisfactorily addressed. That depends on the detail of the deal that is struck. At the current stage in the negotiations there is not the transparency needed to be able to reach a view on whether such risks will be dealt with. EU member states, including the UK, will need to be more closely involved in the negotiations from now on, and engage in turn with environmental groups and agencies, to ensure that environmental issues are adequately considered. The next Government should ensure that the public and the House are given a full and timely opportunity to scrutinise the draft terms of any TTIP settlement before it is a done deal. (page 23)

The committee's sentence at the end of that quote speaks to one of ORG's major concerns. We do not want a situation where the first time we can properly scrutinise a trade agreement negotiated on our behalf is when the terms of the agreement are already locked up. It is undemocratic to decide on important trade measures behind closed doors.

We hope the British Government and the European Commission will take on board the recommendations of this House of Commons report.

Digital Rights Matter Day: Coming soon

By Ruth Coustick-Deal on Mar 05, 2015.

By Ruth Coustick-Deal Mar 05 2015

Comments (0)
On Thursday 19th March we're giving our membership and campaign funding one big boost: Take part in #digitalrightsmatter day.

GCHQ is damaging businesses and the digital economy – we need your help

By Jim Killock on Feb 26, 2015.

By Jim Killock Feb 26 2015

Comments (0)
Tags:
Politicians are often deaf to arguments against mass surveillance. They will talk about encryption as if it’s for criminals, and tell people that “if you’ve nothing to hide, you’ve nothing to fear”.

CITIZENFOUR: Best documentary of 2014 on tonight

By Ruth Coustick-Deal on Feb 25, 2015.

By Ruth Coustick-Deal Feb 25 2015

Comments (0)
The Oscar and BAFTA winning CITIZENFOUR will be shown on Channel 4 tonight. The film shows the scale of the surveillance undertaken by the intelligence agencies behind our backs, and the story of Edward Snowden.

Election funding update: half way there!

By Ruth Coustick-Deal on Feb 25, 2015.

By Ruth Coustick-Deal Feb 25 2015

Comments (0)
On January 10 we launched a new campaign to fund our election work. Today we are 50% of the way there! Read about why we are doing it and how you can help.

Hate speech social media bans may not be the answer

By Javier Ruiz on Feb 09, 2015.

By Javier Ruiz Feb 09 2015

Comments (1)
Parliamentary report on antisemitism calls for protection orders used to ban sex offenders from using the internet to be extended to hate crime. But these should be used to prevent serious harm, not as punishment for hate speech in general.

The real impact of surveillance

By Ruth Coustick-Deal on Feb 05, 2015.

By Ruth Coustick-Deal Feb 05 2015

Comments (3)
Mass surveillance isn't the security blanket that politicians are holding it up to be. For many people surveillance makes them less safe.


Comments (0)



This thread has been closed from taking new comments.