<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Rights Group Newsblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>File-sharing sweep hits 20 &#8220;innocent&#8221; people</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/file-sharing-sweep-hits-20-innocent-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/file-sharing-sweep-hits-20-innocent-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which? Computing claims to have discovered 20 people who say they&#8217;ve been mistakenly targeted as illegal file-sharers by a law firm sending out threatening letters.
According to Which? Computing, ACS Law has sent out around 6,000 letters on behalf of games firms Reality Pump and Topware Interactive, claiming that people have been caught illegally file-sharing their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Which? Computing claims to have discovered 20 people who say they&#8217;ve been mistakenly targeted as illegal file-sharers by a law firm sending out threatening letters.</p>
<p>According to Which? Computing, ACS Law has sent out around 6,000 letters on behalf of games firms Reality Pump and Topware Interactive, claiming that people have been caught illegally file-sharing their games. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/259744/filesharing-sweep-hits-20-innocent-people.html">PC Pro</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/file-sharing-sweep-hits-20-innocent-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministry of Justice data breaches go up by 43 per cent</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/ministry-of-justice-data-breaches-go-up-by-43-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/ministry-of-justice-data-breaches-go-up-by-43-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ministry of Justice has seen its number of information breaches increase from 563 in 2007/08 to 1,316 in 2008/09.
These figures, revealed in a parliamentary written answer, equate to a 43 per cent increase in one year. 
Source: publicservice.co.uk
Hat tip: @privacyint
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Ministry of Justice has seen its number of information breaches increase from 563 in 2007/08 to 1,316 in 2008/09.</p>
<p>These figures, revealed in a parliamentary written answer, equate to a 43 per cent increase in one year. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=9958">publicservice.co.uk</a><br />
Hat tip:<a href="http://www.twitter.com/privacyint"> @privacyint</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/ministry-of-justice-data-breaches-go-up-by-43-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dataset of passengers going through every UK rail station</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/dataset-of-passengers-going-through-every-uk-rail-station/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/dataset-of-passengers-going-through-every-uk-rail-station/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[eGoverment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest station usage information is based on ticket sales in the financial year 2007-08 and covers all National Rail stations throughout England, Scotland and Wales. The station usage figures are subdivided by ticket type (full, reduced and season tickets), whilst information on the county and region of each station is also provided.
Source: Office of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The latest station usage information is based on ticket sales in the financial year 2007-08 and covers all National Rail stations throughout England, Scotland and Wales. The station usage figures are subdivided by ticket type (full, reduced and season tickets), whilst information on the county and region of each station is also provided.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/nav.1529">Office of Rail Regultion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/dataset-of-passengers-going-through-every-uk-rail-station/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs to debate ID card in the House of Commons on Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/mps-to-debate-id-card-in-the-house-of-commons-on-monday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/mps-to-debate-id-card-in-the-house-of-commons-on-monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ID Cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tory motion will allow House of Commons to discuss controversial scheme and examine if the government has made a U-turn or not
MPs are to debate ID card policy in the House of Commons on Monday (6 July) in a motion called by the Tory Party.
There has been growing speculation in recent weeks about the future [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tory motion will allow House of Commons to discuss controversial scheme and examine if the government has made a U-turn or not</p>
<p>MPs are to debate ID card policy in the House of Commons on Monday (6 July) in a motion called by the Tory Party.</p>
<p>There has been growing speculation in recent weeks about the future of the controversial scheme.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.computing.co.uk/computing/news/2245301/mps-debate-id-cards-policy">Computing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/mps-to-debate-id-card-in-the-house-of-commons-on-monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission for Rural Communities releases data sets for mashups</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/commission-for-rural-communities-releases-data-sets-for-mashups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/commission-for-rural-communities-releases-data-sets-for-mashups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[eGoverment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an Output Area file which contains a measure of distance from households to various services for England, this file has been made available to allow users to develop their own bespoke analysis of access to services data.
Source: Commission for Rural Communities
For more data sets see Rural Services Data Series
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is an Output Area file which contains a measure of distance from households to various services for England, this file has been made available to allow users to develop their own bespoke analysis of access to services data.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ruralcommunities.gov.uk/publications/ruralservicesdataseriesavailabilityofservicesoutputareadata2009">Commission for Rural Communities</a><br />
For more data sets see <a href="http://www.ruralcommunities.gov.uk/projects/ruralservicesseriesdata/overview">Rural Services Data Series</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/commission-for-rural-communities-releases-data-sets-for-mashups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-borders plan &#8216;could breach EU law&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/e-borders-plan-could-breach-eu-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/e-borders-plan-could-breach-eu-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eGoverment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government&#8217;s flagship e-borders programme is in disarray and could breach EU law, major transport operators said. 
The £750 million programme to collect electronic records of everyone who enters and leaves the UK will also miss Home Office deadlines, they said. 
&#8230;
Firms also fear that by taking passport data they may breach French and Belgian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Government&#8217;s flagship e-borders programme is in disarray and could breach EU law, major transport operators said. </p>
<p>The £750 million programme to collect electronic records of everyone who enters and leaves the UK will also miss Home Office deadlines, they said. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Firms also fear that by taking passport data they may breach French and Belgian law which states only law enforcement officials can do so.</p>
<p>Bulk transfer of passenger data could also breach EU data protection rules, he said.</p>
<p>Requiring passengers to provide the information could fall foul of the right to free movement enshrined in EU treaties. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5699205/E-borders-plan-could-breach-EU-law.html">Telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/e-borders-plan-could-breach-eu-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which? says innocents accused of net piracy</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/which-says-innocents-accused-of-net-piracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/which-says-innocents-accused-of-net-piracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some 20 net users have come forward claiming they have been wrongly accused of illegally sharing video games. It follows an investigation by Which? Computing magazine into a couple who were accused of playing a game they claim they had never heard of. 
Source: BBC
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some 20 net users have come forward claiming they have been wrongly accused of illegally sharing video games. It follows an investigation by Which? Computing magazine into a couple who were accused of playing a game they claim they had never heard of. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8129261.stm">BBC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/which-says-innocents-accused-of-net-piracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash for Pirate Bay file-sharers</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/cash-for-pirate-bay-file-sharers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/cash-for-pirate-bay-file-sharers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exclusive interview with the BBC, GGF&#8217;s Hans Pandeya said that the only way to beat illegal file-sharing was to make something more attractive.
&#8220;We are going to set up a system where the file-sharer actually makes money,&#8221; he said.
According to Mr Pandeya, GGF&#8217;s chief executive, the business model for The Pirate Bay would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In an exclusive interview with the BBC, GGF&#8217;s Hans Pandeya said that the only way to beat illegal file-sharing was to make something more attractive.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are going to set up a system where the file-sharer actually makes money,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>According to Mr Pandeya, GGF&#8217;s chief executive, the business model for The Pirate Bay would be that it continued to be a file-sharing site. The only difference - at least in terms of content - would be that the files would be hosted legally, rather than stolen from copyright holders. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8128551.stm">BBC News</a><br />
via: <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090701/1050405422.shtml">Techdirt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/cash-for-pirate-bay-file-sharers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulators push for fairer, easier data protection compliance in outsourcing deals</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/regulators-push-for-fairer-easier-data-protection-compliance-in-outsourcing-deals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/regulators-push-for-fairer-easier-data-protection-compliance-in-outsourcing-deals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Commission should make sure that outsourcing providers who process personal data are bound by consistent rules irrespective of whether they are based inside or outside the EU, data protection watchdogs have said.
The European Union&#8217;s Article 29 Working Party, which consists of the privacy regulators from the 27 EU nations, have published an opinion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The European Commission should make sure that outsourcing providers who process personal data are bound by consistent rules irrespective of whether they are based inside or outside the EU, data protection watchdogs have said.</p>
<p>The European Union&#8217;s Article 29 Working Party, which consists of the privacy regulators from the 27 EU nations, have published an opinion on an as-yet unpublished European Commission policy change on the transfer of personal data outside the European Economic Area (EEA).</p>
<p>It said that the Commission needs to adopt a more consistent approach in its policy governing processors.</p>
<p>Companies that handle personal data are required by the EU&#8217;s Data Protection Directive to make sure that any outsourcing providers they use give adequate protection and security for that data, even if those providers are outside the EU and so not directly bound by the Directive.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10137">Out-Law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/07/regulators-push-for-fairer-easier-data-protection-compliance-in-outsourcing-deals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Secretary affirms commitment to identity cards by accelerating rollout</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/06/home-secretary-affirms-commitment-to-identity-cards-by-accelerating-rollout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/06/home-secretary-affirms-commitment-to-identity-cards-by-accelerating-rollout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ID Cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rollout of identity cards will be accelerated under new proposals set out today by Home Secretary Alan Johnson, highlighting the benefits of identity cards to those who need them most.
In addition to residents of Greater Manchester, who will be able to apply for an Identity card before the end of this year, residents in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The rollout of identity cards will be accelerated under new proposals set out today by Home Secretary Alan Johnson, highlighting the benefits of identity cards to those who need them most.</p>
<p>In addition to residents of Greater Manchester, who will be able to apply for an Identity card before the end of this year, residents in locations across the North West will be entitled to apply from early next year.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/1158.htm">Identity &#038; Passport Service</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2009/06/home-secretary-affirms-commitment-to-identity-cards-by-accelerating-rollout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
