<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Rights Group Newsblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Jammie Thomas judge: &#8220;error of law&#8221; may result in new trial</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/jammie-thomas-judge-error-of-law-may-result-in-new-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/jammie-thomas-judge-error-of-law-may-result-in-new-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levitt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Ars Technica.)

Citing a flawed jury instruction and a precedent-setting Eighth Circuit ruling he was previously unaware of, Judge Michael Davis is on the cusp of granting Jammie Thomas&#8217; request for a new trial.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/BAaf/~3/291051629/20080515-jammie-thomas-likely-to-get-new-trial.html">Ars Technica</a>.)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Citing a flawed jury instruction and a precedent-setting Eighth Circuit ruling he was previously unaware of, Judge Michael Davis is on the cusp of granting Jammie Thomas&#8217; request for a new trial.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/jammie-thomas-judge-error-of-law-may-result-in-new-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHS stalls electronic record system rollout</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nhs-stalls-electronic-record-system-rollout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nhs-stalls-electronic-record-system-rollout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via ZDNet) Nick Heath writes
The NHS has pledged to halt the further rollout of its electronic patient record system while it takes stock of criticisms in a report. A report evaluating the trial rollout of the Summary Care Record (SCR) system highlighted concerns that the system was clunky, interfaces poorly with other systems and was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39418103,00.htm">ZDNet</a>) Nick Heath writes</p>
<p>The NHS has pledged to halt the further rollout of its electronic patient record system while it takes stock of criticisms in a report. A report evaluating the trial rollout of the Summary Care Record (SCR) system highlighted concerns that the system was clunky, interfaces poorly with other systems and was being foisted upon patients without their full knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nhs-stalls-electronic-record-system-rollout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIPA decryption use disclosed</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/ripa-decryption-use-disclosed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/ripa-decryption-use-disclosed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ripa homeoffice privacy encryption uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Linx Public Affairs blog:
The Home Office has disclosed police use of powers to demand the decryption of data or production of decryption keys.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/?p=756">Linx Public Affairs</a> blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Home Office has disclosed police use of powers to demand the decryption of data or production of decryption keys.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/ripa-decryption-use-disclosed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep packet inspection under assault over privacy concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/deep-packet-inspection-under-assault-over-privacy-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/deep-packet-inspection-under-assault-over-privacy-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levitt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Ars Technica.)

A Canadian law clinic has asked the country&#8217;s Privacy Commissioner to take a closer look at the deep packet inspection being used by Bell Canada and others. While the technology also raises net neutrality concerns, in this case the issue is privacy.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/BAaf/~3/288831831/20080512-deep-packet-inspection-under-assault-from-canadian-critics.html">Ars Technica</a>.)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A Canadian law clinic has asked the country&#8217;s Privacy Commissioner to take a closer look at the deep packet inspection being used by Bell Canada and others. While the technology also raises net neutrality concerns, in this case the issue is privacy.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/deep-packet-inspection-under-assault-over-privacy-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay: MPAA&#8217;s $15.4 million damage claim a fabrication</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/pirate-bay-mpaas-154-million-damage-claim-a-fabrication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/pirate-bay-mpaas-154-million-damage-claim-a-fabrication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levitt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Ars Technica.)

The MPAA has asked a Swedish court for $15.4 million in damages from The Pirate Bay. Peter Sunde, the torrent tracker&#8217;s fearless captain, says that the claims are bogus.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/BAaf/~3/286866215/20080509-pirate-bay-mpaas-15-4-million-damage-claim-a-fabrication.html">Ars Technica</a>.)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The MPAA has asked a Swedish court for $15.4 million in damages from The Pirate Bay. Peter Sunde, the torrent tracker&#8217;s fearless captain, says that the claims are bogus.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/pirate-bay-mpaas-154-million-damage-claim-a-fabrication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TorrentSpy ordered to pay $110m</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/torrentspy-ordered-to-pay-110m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/torrentspy-ordered-to-pay-110m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via BBC

File-sharing site TorrentSpy has been ordered to pay $110m (£56m) in damages to the Motion Picture Association of America for copyright infringement.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7389485.stm">BBC</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
File-sharing site TorrentSpy has been ordered to pay $110m (£56m) in damages to the Motion Picture Association of America for copyright infringement.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/torrentspy-ordered-to-pay-110m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine Inch Nails release free, CC licensed album</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nine-inch-nails-release-free-cc-licensed-album/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nine-inch-nails-release-free-cc-licensed-album/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Business in the Digital Era]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trent Reznor has released the latest Nine Inch Nails album as a free download under a Creative Commons attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.
As a thank you to our fans for your continued support, we are giving away the new nine inch nails album one hundred percent free, exclusively via nin.com.
We encourage you to remix it, share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent Reznor has <a href="http://theslip.nin.com/">released the latest Nine Inch Nails album as a free download</a> under a Creative Commons attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license.</p>
<blockquote><p>As a thank you to our fans for your continued support, we are giving away the new nine inch nails album one hundred percent free, exclusively via nin.com.</p>
<p>We encourage you to remix it, share it with your friends, post it on your blog, play it on your podcast, give it to strangers, etc.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/nine-inch-nails-release-free-cc-licensed-album/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The law of Phorm</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/the-law-of-phorm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/the-law-of-phorm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via OUT-LAW
EDITORIAL: Critics have branded Phorm a regulatory rogue. Its targeted advertising technology will bend our laws and even break them. But these will be hairline fractures – even if Phorm&#8217;s operation makes you wince.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9090">OUT-LAW</a></p>
<blockquote><p>EDITORIAL: Critics have branded Phorm a regulatory rogue. Its targeted advertising technology will bend our laws and even break them. But these will be hairline fractures – even if Phorm&#8217;s operation makes you wince.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/the-law-of-phorm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identity &#8220;at risk&#8221; on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/identity-at-risk-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/identity-at-risk-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via BBC

Personal details of Facebook users could potentially be stolen, the BBC technology programme Click has found. The popular social networking site allows users to add a variety of applications to their profile. But a malicious program, masquerading as a harmless application, could potentially harvest personal data.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/7375772.stm">BBC</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Personal details of Facebook users could potentially be stolen, the BBC technology programme Click has found. The popular social networking site allows users to add a variety of applications to their profile. But a malicious program, masquerading as a harmless application, could potentially harvest personal data.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/identity-at-risk-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax staff breach data security</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/tax-staff-breach-data-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/tax-staff-breach-data-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dpa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hmrc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the BBC:
More than 600 staff at HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have been disciplined for accessing personal or sensitive data, it has been revealed.
In a Commons written reply, Treasury Financial Secretary Jane Kennedy said that in many cases the penalty for staff was dismissal.
There were 238 people disciplined in 2005, 180 in 2006, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7376586.stm">From the BBC</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>More than 600 staff at HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have been disciplined for accessing personal or sensitive data, it has been revealed.</p>
<p>In a Commons written reply, Treasury Financial Secretary Jane Kennedy said that in many cases the penalty for staff was dismissal.</p>
<p>There were 238 people disciplined in 2005, 180 in 2006, and 192 in 2007.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/2008/05/tax-staff-breach-data-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
