Defining the boundaries
One aspect of the Creative Business in the Digital Era project that I’ve been slightly struggling with is defining what makes a good example of open IP? One of the first reactions to the list of projects that might be relevant was “Where is the open source?” It’s a good question.
The answer is that I’m not really sure where open source projects fit in. Being open source by itself isn’t as enough to be included, because this project is about business models, and not all open source projects come with a business plan or are intended to make money. I’ve also been asked about open source infrastructure companies whose work is essential to the success of other people’s businesses. Examples might include things like peer-to-peer clients or server technologies. But again, it really depends on whether the software is being produced as part of a business.
Another facet to open source is the companies that use open source software and are commercial, but aren’t producing any IP themselves. I think I’m pretty clear on this one: these companies do not fall within the CBDE remit simply because they aren’t creating intellectual property.
Then there are companies that use open IP in order to provide a service to others, whether that’s the IP creator themselves or some other party. Sites like Flickr or Moo are important facilitators for people to make the most of their and other people’s intellectual property - in both cases photographs and designs - but I am unclear as to what intellectual property they are giving away that they have created themselves.
I suppose this all revolves around a few key questions:
- What intellectual property is being created?
- How is that intellectual property being given away?
- How does giving away that intellectual property benefit, directly or indirectly, the creator’s business?
I think I may need to rearrange the research page on the wiki to try and clarify what precisely we need to know in order to understand if a particular project or business meets our criteria.


