<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data Sharing Review: A consultation on the use and sharing of personal information in the public and private sectors</title>
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FishNChipPapers</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>FishNChipPapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Individuals: the risks of erroneous information being gathered and shared resulting in incorrect decision making by the sharers. It is often challenging for individuals to correct that information. I have personal experience of a change in post code by the post office resulting in a failed credit check. It required significant effort for the error to be corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individuals: the risks of erroneous information being gathered and shared resulting in incorrect decision making by the sharers. It is often challenging for individuals to correct that information. I have personal experience of a change in post code by the post office resulting in a failed credit check. It required significant effort for the error to be corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishNChipPapers</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>FishNChipPapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Individuals: selective discrimination based on data aggregation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individuals: selective discrimination based on data aggregation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishNChipPapers</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>FishNChipPapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>What is meant by "personal information" in this context. Does there need to be clarification e.g. there has been some debate recently as to whether an IP address is "personal information"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is meant by &#8220;personal information&#8221; in this context. Does there need to be clarification e.g. there has been some debate recently as to whether an IP address is &#8220;personal information&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Supporters update - January 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Supporters update - January 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>[...] so our pro-consumer perspective will be vital here. We are also drafting a response to the Data Sharing Review and would appreciate input on, in particular, public authorities that hold too much data. And - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] so our pro-consumer perspective will be vital here. We are also drafting a response to the Data Sharing Review and would appreciate input on, in particular, public authorities that hold too much data. And - [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>The Information Commissioner should have powers, a la the HSE, to inspect data controllers without their consent. Penalties for deliberate or reckless misuse or dissemination of personal data should be much higher. I think the current maximum is £5,000 which is completely pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Information Commissioner should have powers, a la the HSE, to inspect data controllers without their consent. Penalties for deliberate or reckless misuse or dissemination of personal data should be much higher. I think the current maximum is £5,000 which is completely pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Individuals: Fraud, also other risks to vulnerable people -- domestic abuse victims, people in witness protection programmes -- essentially, anyone who has a legitimate reason to hide.

Society: Excessive sharing of personal information is detrimental to the privacy, and hence the dignity, of the individual. Individual dignity is essential to the functioning of a liberal democracy. It is important that, if more data is to be shared, we avoid the death of a thousand cuts! Wholesale breaches of privacy have a dehumanising affect -- it is not necessary for anyone to experience a material loss for that to be true. This is a point which seems to be being completely overlooked by Government at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individuals: Fraud, also other risks to vulnerable people &#8212; domestic abuse victims, people in witness protection programmes &#8212; essentially, anyone who has a legitimate reason to hide.</p>
<p>Society: Excessive sharing of personal information is detrimental to the privacy, and hence the dignity, of the individual. Individual dignity is essential to the functioning of a liberal democracy. It is important that, if more data is to be shared, we avoid the death of a thousand cuts! Wholesale breaches of privacy have a dehumanising affect &#8212; it is not necessary for anyone to experience a material loss for that to be true. This is a point which seems to be being completely overlooked by Government at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Hogge</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>What unacceptable risk is generated when, eg, the BBC is given the entire National Insurance database to aid it with digital switchover? or Transport for London allow the Met creeping access to congestion charge number plate info?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What unacceptable risk is generated when, eg, the BBC is given the entire National Insurance database to aid it with digital switchover? or Transport for London allow the Met creeping access to congestion charge number plate info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Hogge</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/consult/data-sharing-review/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>So, when I give a piece of information to a public body, I need to know to what purposes it will be put. I tell Islington Council the name of my partner when I set up my council tax. What other public sector bodies will know the name of my partner in six months time, and to what use might they put that information that I may not want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when I give a piece of information to a public body, I need to know to what purposes it will be put. I tell Islington Council the name of my partner when I set up my council tax. What other public sector bodies will know the name of my partner in six months time, and to what use might they put that information that I may not want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
