Contactpoint and the eCAF: experts on film
Action on Rights for Children (ARCH) have today released a series of videos outlining the dangers posed to children by the Government’s plans to roll-out ever larger databases which track their development and contact with social services. The two systems in the ACRH spotlight are ContactPoint, a directory of all children which tracks them from birth and provides a list of the agencies with which they have come into contact, and the Common Assessment Framework (eCAF), an in-depth, personal assessment tool for cross-agency information-sharing on children not seen to be progressing well enough towards the government’s “five outcomes”.
The videos are short, snappy, and well worth watching. Here are some choice quotes from the experts interviewed:
“This whole information sharing, ‘Every Child Matters” agenda has been sold as a response to the death of Victoria Climbie. In fact that isn’t true. This agenda was under discussion years before… It was initially envisaged as part of the e-Government agenda. The agenda to create a central spine… through which all services would be provided. And early on children were identified as a useful area to start.”
Terri Dowty, Director, ARCH
“The methodology that has evolved in Whitehall… is towards building large centralised databases that allow greater… control of the activities of public sector workers out in the field. And I’m afraid that this has become a programme that has acquired its own momentum and has been driven as an e-Government thing, rather than as a social work thing. And that’s wrong. If you want decent systems, they’ve got to be driven by the people who are actually going to use them.”
Professor Ross Anderson
“The government’s talking about over 300,000 people having authorised access. Inevitably, some of those people will be open to taking bribes to provide information from the database to people who shouldn’t have access.”
Dr Ian Brown
“The ‘Every Child Matters’ agenda is an agenda of criminalising children, rather than protecting them. If you’re going to view children as potentially being a problem to society then it’s very difficult to view those same children as possible victims of child abuse.”
Dr Elizabeth Davies
“Too often, government responds to various legitimate fears about child protection and terrorism with the idea that what we need are ever larger databases [but] of you’re looking for a needle in a haystack, why build an ever bigger haystack?”
Shami Chakrabati, Director, Liberty
Watch the videos here:
Check out ORG’s campaign resources on Children’s digital rights on the ORGwiki.
May 22nd, 2008 at 12:39 pm
I cannot hear the soundtrack on any of the three videos. Is there a fault? Is there a written transcript available?
Thanks.
June 4th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Has anyone looked at what the solution is in Scotland through the Getting it Right for every Child Agenda. They are using something called an eCare Framework that is based on a federated system of viewing information relating to ’specific’ children where agencies are working together. I believe they also have a secure messaging framework for sharing information where it is thougt that help may be required for a child and more information is neeeded to make that decision.
August 29th, 2008 at 10:28 am
I think Scotland have got this right!
I’m not aware of the specific implementation, but the model is extremely effective bringing together the key information and people to make rational decisions, whilst avoiding the inevitable risks of ‘not being my data/problem’.
Wake up England, big isn’t always beautiful.