<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electoral Commission: &#8220;e-voting not a mature technology&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/11/15/electoral-commission-e-voting-not-a-mature-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/11/15/electoral-commission-e-voting-not-a-mature-technology/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Growing the ORG community - and having fun doing it</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/11/15/electoral-commission-e-voting-not-a-mature-technology/#comment-164123</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Growing the ORG community - and having fun doing it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/11/15/electoral-commission-e-voting-not-a-mature-technology/#comment-164123</guid>
		<description>[...] that could have swayed an election, and put electronic voting on the back-burner for years (tick). Not singlehandedly beat back the music industry&#8217;s lobbying for copyright term extension in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that could have swayed an election, and put electronic voting on the back-burner for years (tick). Not singlehandedly beat back the music industry&#8217;s lobbying for copyright term extension in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
