<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Commissioner Horrified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/07/11/information-commissioner-horrified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/07/11/information-commissioner-horrified/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Lords report promotes security online</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/07/11/information-commissioner-horrified/#comment-96112</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; Lords report promotes security online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/07/11/information-commissioner-horrified/#comment-96112</guid>
		<description>[...] Other recommendations include more research funding for computer security groups and a re-examination of the Computer Misuse Act. The Committee also adds its voice to the chorus of people calling for greater powers for the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office. While such a detailed, considered and well-informed report should be welcomed, the digital rights community needs to pay close attention to how policy makers choose to interpret its recommendations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other recommendations include more research funding for computer security groups and a re-examination of the Computer Misuse Act. The Committee also adds its voice to the chorus of people calling for greater powers for the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office. While such a detailed, considered and well-informed report should be welcomed, the digital rights community needs to pay close attention to how policy makers choose to interpret its recommendations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
