<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The knowledge Revolution &#124; FreieNetze</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-103219</link>
		<dc:creator>The knowledge Revolution &#124; FreieNetze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-103219</guid>
		<description>[...] In ihrem Beitrag auf opendemocray gibt Becky Hogge  einen &#220;berblick &#252;ber aktuelle Entwicklungen und liefert beste Beispiele daf&#252;r, dass vielleicht mehr als nur eine kleine Revolution m&#246;glich ist. At the heart of that effort will be the very way we define and consider intellectual-property law. Despite the protestations of rightsholders and the forums they capture (most recently, the House of Commons’s select committee on culture, media and sport), intellectual-property law has little to do with morals or natural rights.   Geschrieben in Medienrecht, Urheberrecht [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In ihrem Beitrag auf opendemocray gibt Becky Hogge  einen &#220;berblick &#252;ber aktuelle Entwicklungen und liefert beste Beispiele daf&#252;r, dass vielleicht mehr als nur eine kleine Revolution m&#246;glich ist. At the heart of that effort will be the very way we define and consider intellectual-property law. Despite the protestations of rightsholders and the forums they capture (most recently, the House of Commons’s select committee on culture, media and sport), intellectual-property law has little to do with morals or natural rights.   Geschrieben in Medienrecht, Urheberrecht [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; UK Government says no to term extension</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-89666</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive &#187; UK Government says no to term extension</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-89666</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in May, we reported on the House of Commons Culture Committee&#8217;s misguided decision to recommend that the term of copyright in sound recordings be extended. The recommendation come despite compelling evidence that as well as harming consumers and follow on innovators, such a move would bring no benefit to the majority of UK recording artists and would result in a net loss to the UK economy. It also came couched in language that betrayed a basic misunderstanding of copyright law on behalf of the Committee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in May, we reported on the House of Commons Culture Committee&#8217;s misguided decision to recommend that the term of copyright in sound recordings be extended. The recommendation come despite compelling evidence that as well as harming consumers and follow on innovators, such a move would bring no benefit to the majority of UK recording artists and would result in a net loss to the UK economy. It also came couched in language that betrayed a basic misunderstanding of copyright law on behalf of the Committee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BambisMusings - Musings from a little deer? &#187; House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-82373</link>
		<dc:creator>BambisMusings - Musings from a little deer? &#187; House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-82373</guid>
		<description>[...] House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings (OpenRightsGroup.org) after first previously reporting the following: Open Rights Group: “Politicians should listen to facts, not fairytales” (OpenRightsGroup.org) where it was stated: The Open Rights Group today urged MPs to listen to the facts on copyright term extension, and not to the small group of people who seek to distort them by mistaking the copyright regime for a pension scheme. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings (OpenRightsGroup.org) after first previously reporting the following: Open Rights Group: “Politicians should listen to facts, not fairytales” (OpenRightsGroup.org) where it was stated: The Open Rights Group today urged MPs to listen to the facts on copyright term extension, and not to the small group of people who seek to distort them by mistaking the copyright regime for a pension scheme. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The knowledge Revolution &#124; FreieNetze</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-67971</link>
		<dc:creator>The knowledge Revolution &#124; FreieNetze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-67971</guid>
		<description>[...] In ihrem Beitrag auf opendemocray gibt Becky Hogge  einen &#220;berblick &#252;ber aktuelle Entwicklungen und liefert beste Beispiele daf&#252;r, dass vielleicht mehr als nur eine kleine Revolution m&#246;glich ist. At the heart of that effort will be the very way we define and consider intellectual-property law. Despite the protestations of rightsholders and the forums they capture (most recently, the House of Commons&#8217;s select committee on culture, media and sport), intellectual-property law has little to do with morals or natural rights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In ihrem Beitrag auf opendemocray gibt Becky Hogge  einen &#220;berblick &#252;ber aktuelle Entwicklungen und liefert beste Beispiele daf&#252;r, dass vielleicht mehr als nur eine kleine Revolution m&#246;glich ist. At the heart of that effort will be the very way we define and consider intellectual-property law. Despite the protestations of rightsholders and the forums they capture (most recently, the House of Commons&#8217;s select committee on culture, media and sport), intellectual-property law has little to do with morals or natural rights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Follow Ups for Week Ending 5/20/2007 &#171; The Command Line</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-64040</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Follow Ups for Week Ending 5/20/2007 &#171; The Command Line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-64040</guid>
		<description>[...] Copyright extensions roll forward regardless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Copyright extensions roll forward regardless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; Parliament screws up music copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63613</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; Parliament screws up music copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63613</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Harry Metcalfe for alerting Geeklawyer to the news, greeted with weary ennui, that Parliament is thinking of yielding to the special interest groups and uber rich lobbying power of the music cartel. Despite Gower saying that extending the mechanical copyright term from 50 to 70 years was unjustified on economic grounds the vacuous MPs thought the real issue was morality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Harry Metcalfe for alerting Geeklawyer to the news, greeted with weary ennui, that Parliament is thinking of yielding to the special interest groups and uber rich lobbying power of the music cartel. Despite Gower saying that extending the mechanical copyright term from 50 to 70 years was unjustified on economic grounds the vacuous MPs thought the real issue was morality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robmyers &#187; links for 2007-05-16</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63475</link>
		<dc:creator>robmyers &#187; links for 2007-05-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63475</guid>
		<description>[...] The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings IP Maximalism raises its head again in the UK parliament. Write to your MP! (tags: ip-maximalism UK action free-culture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings IP Maximalism raises its head again in the UK parliament. Write to your MP! (tags: ip-maximalism UK action free-culture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robmyers &#187; The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63448</link>
		<dc:creator>robmyers &#187; The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63448</guid>
		<description>[...] The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Open Rights Group : Blog Archive » House of Commons culture committee rules in favour of copyright term extension on sound recordings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63405</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63405</guid>
		<description>The Committee's current members are listed below. Please write to express your perspective if you're a constituent.

Mr John Whittingdale MP	- Maldon and East Chelmsford - Conservative
Janet Anderson MP - Rossendale and Darwen - Labour
Philip Davies MP - Shipley - Conservative
Mr Nigel Evans MP - Ribble Valley - Conservative
Paul Farrelly MP - Newcastle-under-Lyme - Labour
Mr Mike Hall MP	- Weaver Valley	- Labour
Alan Keen MP - Feltham and Heston - Labour
Rosemary McKenna MP - Cumbernauld and Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East - Labour
Adam Price MP - Carmarthen East and Dinefwr - Plaid Cymru
Mr Adrian Sanders MP - Torbay - Liberal Democrats
Helen Southworth MP - Warrington South - Labour</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Committee&#8217;s current members are listed below. Please write to express your perspective if you&#8217;re a constituent.</p>
<p>Mr John Whittingdale MP	- Maldon and East Chelmsford - Conservative<br />
Janet Anderson MP - Rossendale and Darwen - Labour<br />
Philip Davies MP - Shipley - Conservative<br />
Mr Nigel Evans MP - Ribble Valley - Conservative<br />
Paul Farrelly MP - Newcastle-under-Lyme - Labour<br />
Mr Mike Hall MP	- Weaver Valley	- Labour<br />
Alan Keen MP - Feltham and Heston - Labour<br />
Rosemary McKenna MP - Cumbernauld and Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East - Labour<br />
Adam Price MP - Carmarthen East and Dinefwr - Plaid Cymru<br />
Mr Adrian Sanders MP - Torbay - Liberal Democrats<br />
Helen Southworth MP - Warrington South - Labour</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/05/16/house-of-commons-culture-committee-rules-in-favour-of-copyright-term-extension-on-sound-recordings/#comment-63399</guid>
		<description>The CMS committee is chaired by John Whittingdale MP, who at a Conservative party conference fringe meeting on copyright last year spouted the most &lt;a href="http://dooooooom.blogspot.com/2006/10/tory-spouts-nonsense-on-intellectual.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;retrograde nonsense&lt;/a&gt; I have heard on the subject for some time. I suspect he embarrassed even the right holders present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CMS committee is chaired by John Whittingdale MP, who at a Conservative party conference fringe meeting on copyright last year spouted the most <a href="http://dooooooom.blogspot.com/2006/10/tory-spouts-nonsense-on-intellectual.html" rel="nofollow">retrograde nonsense</a> I have heard on the subject for some time. I suspect he embarrassed even the right holders present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
