<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPI asks ISPs to do its dirty work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/07/11/bpi-asks-isps-to-do-its-dirty-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/07/11/bpi-asks-isps-to-do-its-dirty-work/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clock IT Up</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/07/11/bpi-asks-isps-to-do-its-dirty-work/#comment-163473</link>
		<dc:creator>Clock IT Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=129#comment-163473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Talk Talk Refuse To Internet Police For BPI...&lt;/strong&gt;

The BPI - British Phonographic Industry have asked ISP Internet Service Provider Talk Talk to act on information provided by them regarding customers of Talk Talk that are downloading illegal copyright material.
Under this agreement, Talk Talk would be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Talk Talk Refuse To Internet Police For BPI&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The BPI - British Phonographic Industry have asked ISP Internet Service Provider Talk Talk to act on information provided by them regarding customers of Talk Talk that are downloading illegal copyright material.<br />
Under this agreement, Talk Talk would be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/07/11/bpi-asks-isps-to-do-its-dirty-work/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=129#comment-478</guid>
		<description>The moral here is never piss off the legal department:
(Also from the reply)
"It is not for Tiscali, as an ISP, nor the BPI, as a trade association, to effectively act as a regulator or law enforcement agency and deny individuals the
right to defend themselves against the allegations made against them."

Lets hope that the in-house lawers at Ticali make it their mission to defeat this headlong charge into circumventing established legal process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moral here is never piss off the legal department:<br />
(Also from the reply)<br />
&#8220;It is not for Tiscali, as an ISP, nor the BPI, as a trade association, to effectively act as a regulator or law enforcement agency and deny individuals the<br />
right to defend themselves against the allegations made against them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lets hope that the in-house lawers at Ticali make it their mission to defeat this headlong charge into circumventing established legal process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
