Comments on: New ORG Theme http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/ Protecting your rights in the digital age Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:04:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Matt Oakes http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-428 Matt Oakes Tue, 30 May 2006 23:20:52 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-428 No problem, thanks for letting me help :D No problem, thanks for letting me help :D

]]> By: Mike Little http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-426 Mike Little Mon, 22 May 2006 21:59:20 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-426 Ken, Thanks for that. I've corrected it now. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed:_URI_scheme" rel="nofollow">feed: URI scheme</a> is a still-in-draft standard. Mike Ken,
Thanks for that. I’ve corrected it now. The feed: URI scheme is a still-in-draft standard.

Mike

]]> By: Ken http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-425 Ken Mon, 22 May 2006 21:50:43 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-425 A minor glitch (I think). The url behind the RSS link is "feed:http://www.openrightsgroup.org/feed/". I'm no expert on what lies to the left of the "://", but I suspect that's wrong. Ken A minor glitch (I think). The url behind the RSS link is “feed:http://www.openrightsgroup.org/feed/”.

I’m no expert on what lies to the left of the “://”, but I suspect
that’s wrong.

Ken

]]> By: squashed http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-424 squashed Mon, 22 May 2006 04:16:29 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-424 Hey the blog looks really nice. Good job. Hey the blog looks really nice. Good job.

]]> By: James Reeves http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-421 James Reeves Tue, 16 May 2006 21:07:47 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-421 Ah well. Sometimes there's no way to improve these things. It looks good, regardless :) Ah well. Sometimes there’s no way to improve these things. It looks good, regardless :)

]]> By: Mike Little http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-420 Mike Little Tue, 16 May 2006 20:48:20 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-420 Hi James, I did try it as white and bold at one point, I think Suw wanted as it is now. Although black on red is not normally good contrast, I think the larger font size compensates here. I did try bold too, but I don't think it improved things. Hi James,
I did try it as white and bold at one point, I think Suw wanted as it is now. Although black on red is not normally good contrast, I think the larger font size compensates here. I did try bold too, but I don’t think it improved things.

]]> By: James Reeves http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/05/16/new-org-theme/#comment-419 James Reeves Tue, 16 May 2006 18:50:07 +0000 http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=106#comment-419 Very nice, indeed! Professional and eye-catching, and the red fits in well with the logo. The EFF also has a reddish theme, so you're obvously in good company! The slogan in the top right, however - might that not look better as white? Maybe bolded? The bright red and thin black font don't seem to go together... Or is that just me? Very nice, indeed! Professional and eye-catching, and the red fits in well with the logo. The EFF also has a reddish theme, so you’re obvously in good company!

The slogan in the top right, however - might that not look better as white? Maybe bolded? The bright red and thin black font don’t seem to go together… Or is that just me?

]]>