<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APIG DRM public inquiry hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/</link>
	<description>Protecting your rights in the digital age</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=80#comment-292</guid>
		<description>A reminder to those who find this that we are collecting the formal submissions as we find them over at:

http://www.openrightsgroup.org/orgwiki/index.php/APIG_DRM_Public_Inquiry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reminder to those who find this that we are collecting the formal submissions as we find them over at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/orgwiki/index.php/APIG_DRM_Public_Inquiry" rel="nofollow">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/orgwiki/index.php/APIG_DRM_Public_Inquiry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suw Charman</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw Charman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=80#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Weird to be relying on The Register to remind me of what we said. ;-) 

I had permission from APIG to take and publish notes, but I didn't want to push my luck with an audio recording. Not sure if those are allowed. Next week I will email and ask them when the transcript is coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird to be relying on The Register to remind me of what we said. <img src='http://www.openrightsgroup.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I had permission from APIG to take and publish notes, but I didn&#8217;t want to push my luck with an audio recording. Not sure if those are allowed. Next week I will email and ask them when the transcript is coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=80#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Good work, nice to see ORG having some impact in high places. TheRegister also carried the story a few days ago, and gives some more detail on ORG's contribution.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/02/apig_hears_evidence/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work, nice to see ORG having some impact in high places. TheRegister also carried the story a few days ago, and gives some more detail on ORG&#8217;s contribution.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/02/apig_hears_evidence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/02/apig_hears_evidence/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suw Charman</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw Charman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=80#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I wasn't sure if I caught that right. I'll change it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I wasn&#8217;t sure if I caught that right. I&#8217;ll change it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2006/02/02/apig-drm-public-inquiry-hearing/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/?p=80#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Good note Suw. One comment - and it's not a criticism by any means, but I made a note that Ross Anderson said the four big players would be Apply, Sony, Microsoft and Google. I actually wondered at the time why he didn't mention Yahoo, but I am pretty sure he didn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good note Suw. One comment - and it&#8217;s not a criticism by any means, but I made a note that Ross Anderson said the four big players would be Apply, Sony, Microsoft and Google. I actually wondered at the time why he didn&#8217;t mention Yahoo, but I am pretty sure he didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
